AIBenchmarks
RankingsCompareGemini 1.5 Pro vs Grok 2

Gemini 1.5 ProvsGrok 2

Google

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Google's 1M-token multimodal model

Arena ELO
1261
Context
1000K
Speed
150 t/s
Input/1M
$1.25
xAI

Grok 2

🏆 Overall Winner

xAI's real-time knowledge model

Arena ELO
1235
Context
131K
Speed
92 t/s
Input/1M
$2

Capability Radar

Category performance across 6 domains

Benchmark Scores

MMLU · HumanEval · MATH · GSM8K · GPQA · BBH

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Pros

1M token context window
Fastest response times
Best price-to-performance

Cons

Slightly lower reasoning vs GPT-4o/Claude
Less consistent instruction following

Grok 2

Pros

Real-time X/Twitter data access
Integrated image generation (FLUX)
Strong GPQA scores

Cons

Smaller ecosystem
Tied to X/Twitter platform

🏆 Our Verdict

Based on overall benchmark averages, Grok 2 has the edge with an average score of 80.5% across all benchmarks. However, the best choice depends on your use case — Gemini 1.5 Pro excels in 1m token context window, while Grok 2 stands out for real-time x/twitter data access.

More Comparisons

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs GPT-4oGrok 2 vs GPT-4oGemini 1.5 Pro vs Claude 3.5 SonnetGrok 2 vs Claude 3.5 SonnetGemini 1.5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 405BGrok 2 vs Llama 3.1 405BGemini 1.5 Pro vs Mistral Large 2Grok 2 vs Mistral Large 2