Rankings›Compare›Gemini 1.5 Pro vs GPT-4o

Gemini 1.5 ProvsGPT-4o

Google

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Google's 1M-token multimodal model

Arena ELO

1261

Context

1000K

Speed

150 t/s

Input/1M

$1.25

OpenAI

GPT-4o

🏆 Overall Winner

OpenAI's flagship multimodal model

Arena ELO

1314

Context

128K

Speed

110 t/s

Input/1M

$2.5

Capability Radar

Category performance across 6 domains

Benchmark Scores

MMLU · HumanEval · MATH · GSM8K · GPQA · BBH

Gemini 1.5 Pro

Pros

✓1M token context window

✓Fastest response times

✓Best price-to-performance

Cons

✗Slightly lower reasoning vs GPT-4o/Claude

✗Less consistent instruction following

GPT-4o

Pros

✓Best-in-class multimodal capabilities

✓Fastest major frontier model

✓Extensive third-party integrations

Cons

✗Higher cost than alternatives

✗Context window smaller than Gemini 1.5 Pro

🏆 Our Verdict

Based on overall benchmark averages, GPT-4o has the edge with an average score of 81.6% across all benchmarks. However, the best choice depends on your use case — Gemini 1.5 Pro excels in 1m token context window, while GPT-4o stands out for best-in-class multimodal capabilities.

More Comparisons

Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet →GPT-4o vs Claude 3.5 Sonnet →Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Llama 3.1 405B →GPT-4o vs Llama 3.1 405B →Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Grok 2 →GPT-4o vs Grok 2 →Gemini 1.5 Pro vs Mistral Large 2 →GPT-4o vs Mistral Large 2 →