Claude 3.5 SonnetvsGemini 1.5 Pro
Anthropic
🏆 Overall WinnerClaude 3.5 Sonnet
Anthropic's most intelligent model
Arena ELO
1298
Context
200K
Speed
85 t/s
Input/1M
$3
Google
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Google's 1M-token multimodal model
Arena ELO
1261
Context
1000K
Speed
150 t/s
Input/1M
$1.25
Capability Radar
Category performance across 6 domains
Benchmark Scores
MMLU · HumanEval · MATH · GSM8K · GPQA · BBH
Claude 3.5 Sonnet
Pros
✓Best coding (SWE-bench leader)
✓200K context window
✓Exceptional instruction following
Cons
✗Slower than GPT-4o
✗No native audio capabilities
Gemini 1.5 Pro
Pros
✓1M token context window
✓Fastest response times
✓Best price-to-performance
Cons
✗Slightly lower reasoning vs GPT-4o/Claude
✗Less consistent instruction following
🏆 Our Verdict
Based on overall benchmark averages, Claude 3.5 Sonnet has the edge with an average score of 84.6% across all benchmarks. However, the best choice depends on your use case — Claude 3.5 Sonnet excels in best coding (swe-bench leader), while Gemini 1.5 Pro stands out for 1m token context window.